Gilbert Ryle’s The Concept of Mind Essay -- Ryle Concept Mind Philosop

Gilbert Ryles The Concept of MindGilbert Ryles The Concept of Mind (1949) is a critique of the notion that the mind is unambiguous from the body, and is a rejection of the philosophical scheme that mental states ar distinct from material states. Ryle argues that the traditional approach to the carnal knowledge of mind and body (i.e., the approach which is taken by the philosophy of Descartes) assumes that there is a basic distinction in the midst of Mind and Matter. According to Ryle, this assumption is a basic category-mistake, because it attempts to analyze the relation betwen mind and body as if they were terms of the resembling logical category. Furthermore, Ryle argues that traditional Idealism makes a basic category-mistake by trying to reduce physical reality to the same status as mental reality, and that Materialism makes a basic category-mistake by trying to reduce mental reality to the same status as physical reality.Ryle rejects Descartes dualistic opening of the relation betwen mind and body. According to Ryle, this theory attempts to separate mental reality from physical reality, and it attempts to analyze mental processes as if the mind were distinct from the body. As an example of how this doctrine can be misleading, Ryle explains that knowing how to perform an act skillfully is not a way out of purely theoretical reasoning. Knowing how to perform an act skillfully is a emergence of being able to think logically and practically, and is a matter of being able to put practical reasoning into carry out. Practical action is not necessarily produced by highly abstract reasoning, or by an intricate series of intellectual operations. The meaning of actions is not explained by devising inferences about hush-hush mental processes, but is ... ...ocesses which are distinct from plain behavioral responses. Acts such as thinking, remembering, perceiving, and willing are defined by behavioral actions and by dispositions to perform behavioral actions. However, Ryle criticises Behaviorist theory for being overly simplistic and mechanistic, just as he criticizes Cartesian theory for being overly simplistic and mechanistic. While Cartesian theory asserts that hidden mental processes cause the behavioral responses of the conscious individual, Behaviorism asserts that stimulus-response mechanisms cause the behavioral responses of the conscious individual. Ryle argues that both the Cartesian theory and the Behaviorist theory are too simplistic and mechanistic to enable us to fully visualise the Concept of Mind.Works CitedRyle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind. Chicago The University of Chicago Press, 1949.