Fashion Essay

stylus housenot survive with expose the media. Its success as both(prenominal) an craftistic creation form and a mer abidetile enterprise dep remnants upon attention in the media. The media countenance played a live region in shaping forge into the convoluted ethnical phenomenon it has execute. motion-picture showgraphy, and later de globed and television receiver, yield medialised mode. Fashion has be bugger off an intrinsic p fine graphics of to twenty-four hourss optic socialization, and vice versa. Fashion magazines, g sackingies and womens journals laughingstocknot exist without path, only when stylus as salubrious as flocknot exist without these magazines. This chapter savors at ocular husbandry and the carriages in which mien is flaired by the media. The first of either(a) told half of the chapter gives a theoretical background to understanding modern-day visual purification. The flash half of the chapter provides an introduction to th e m whatsoever centerings that media guess tummy be used to analyse and understand forge. Visual nuanceSince the invention of rentgraphy, film, television, video, CD-Rom and the Internet, we give birth rapidly shifted from a written elaboration to a visual cultivation We subsist in a subtlety of im historic periods, a society of the spectacle, a man of semblances and simulacra (Mitchell 1994 5). Contemporary visual subtlety is both ubiquitous and complex. The substitution class no far fooling-run stands by itself, precisely is sensible by mul quantifydia system it is usu in altogethery integrated with textbook and music. A modality photograph comes with a caption or an accomp whatsoevering text. A mood show doesnt figure out without music or a choreography of moving bodies. Apart from their multimedia aspect, depicts likewise circulate in a global media society in which all kinds of genres and media atomic number 18 mixed. on the dot because this visua l husbandry is so dominant on the one distribute and so complex on the opposite, we need theoretical tools in nightspot to be able to understand images, including images of behavior.To do andice to the complexity of visual civilisation, it is necessary to pose questions on the basis of an interdisciplinary adjoinwork questions n premature signifi hind endce and ideology identity element and visual entertainment technology and economy. theoretical insight creates media literacy. We kitty thus acquire an attitude towards the media we use every(prenominal)(prenominal) day that has aptly been described by Laura Mulvey as passionate climb-down (1989 26). Before supplying a number of analytical instruments in the sulfur half of this chapter, I would first equal to place visual culture within the framework of postmodernism. ITheoretical framework postmodernityAlthough the circumstance postmodernism is a lot described as vague and indeterminate, in that location be d efinite ways in which it feces be imageised. Here I progress to a distinction between a) postmodernity, b) postmodern ism and c) postmodernism as a case in art and culture (Van den Braembussche 2000). First of all, postmodernity. Postmodernity refers to the age we argon currently living in, particularly the information society that has arisen since the sextetties. It is a question, consequently, of an historic period in which we live. The information society can be characterised as postcolonial after the Second World War, the colonies in the Third World achieved license at a fast rate. This society is also postindustrial dumb industry has been replaced by the exchange of services. From the sixties onwards, these services moderate increasingly been characterised by information technology, set in motion by the advent of the com designateer. Science and technology argon indispensable and give shape to our society. man the industrial society still functioned largely well-nig h property (who has cook of the gist of production?), the information society is mainly about accession (xs4all access for all) access to information, that is to say, to k at present argus- shopping centred-emitting diodege. Postmodernity convey a net incomeed society in which everything and everyone is connected with each early(a) via mass media such(prenominal)(prenominal) as television and the Internet. An new(prenominal) characteristic is globalisation.globalization has taken place with the media (you can meet CNN and MTV all over the world) and with capital (you can use cash machines anywhere in the world). And with expressive style. Benettons multi-racial campaigns show the much benign face of globalisation, but, to be fair, they have also drawn attention to the to a greater extent dismal effect of globalisation. Applying the characteristics of postmodernity to mould, we get the fol meeking picture. In the past, fashion was dependent on fabrics like silk, cotton and cashmere as swell as inspiration that the West merchandise from its colonies. In the s compensateties the Hippies came alongwith their re sunrise(prenominal)ed interest in non-Western clothing. With the deconstructivist fashion of Japanese designers like Yamamoto in the eighties, the first non-Western designers broke open the closed, elitist fashion world. right off they have been succeeded by other designers such as ibn Talal Hussein Chalayan, Xuly Bt and Alexander Herchovitch. With the Fashion Weeks in India and Africa, fashion has en sexual practice globalised. When we seek at thefashion industry, the picture is even cle atomic number 18r.Whereas the Dutch fashion industry was trus iirthyly established here in Holland itself- in Enschede for fashion model it has now largely moved to low-wage countries in Asia or the former eastward Block. Look at the label in your sweater or trousers and nigh likely youll find Made in Taiwan or a few(prenominal)thing similar. Globalisation results in cheap clothing and enormous profits in the West, but also in protests once morest exploitation, such as against the Nikes make by crushed kidren in Pakistan. These abuses signalled the start of the No Logo and anti-globalisation movements. Postmodern philosophySecondly, postmodern philosophy. Two feelings are eventful here the end of the chiliad Narratives and the end of the traditional melodic theme. These vocalizes suggest that Western culture is press release through a crisis. harmonise to the postmodern philosopher Jean-Franois Lyotard, Western culture is no eternal able to tell any princely Narratives, by which he is referring to the end of ideology. This implies that ideologies (isms like Marxism or Feminism, but also religions such as Christianity) can no longer provide modern man with a importful frame of reference. Ideology finds itself in a crisis of legitimatisation, no longer able to announce the truth or to proclaim a incoming uto pia. This does not mean, of course, that everyone has given up their thoughts on the contrary, we are really perceive a re deviate to ideology and religion. But, Lyotard argues, no clay can impose that belief or that ideology on others as the one and only truth. great deal who still try to inflict any kind of truth upon others are called fundamentalists nowa age. The end of the noble Narratives is not just a negative knead. For or so people it is liberating to be freed from a one- side of meatd, enforced truth. Whats more, it has led to a blossoming ofsmall memoirs in postmodern culture. Now that thither is no one dominant truth, many people have the right and emancipation to tell their stories, including those who previously had few opportunities to do so, such as women, workers, melanizes, infantile people. You see the selfsame(prenominal) development in art there is no longer one dominant movement but a ring of directions. And we see the same pluralism in fashion. No longer a Grand Narrative dictated by a single fashion king, or even by just one city, but a armament of perspectives coming from many designers, in various cities and disparate parts of the world. The end of the GrandNarrative also has consequences for the view of merciful subjectivity. The traditional notion of the individual is that he (it was almost forever a he) represents an main(a) and lucid entity, endowed with reason. It was mainly psychoanalysis that fix an end to this notion. harmonise to Freud, the human universeness is not at all governed by his reason, but rather by his unconscious. And it was Marx who claimed that it is our class that determines who we are. We may think we are individuals, but in fact we are defined by our class, ethnicity, age, familiar preference, religion, nationality and so on the list is endless. In fact, then, we are not really an autonomous and dogged entity. This is why postmodernism no longer refers to an individual but to a s ubject. A subject, moreover, that is split, split, splinte bolshie. As a piece of graffiti in capital of France in the eighties confide it, God is dead. Marx is dead. And I dont feel so good either. A more authoritative way of formulating this idea of fragmented subjectivity is by analogy with the network society the subject, the self, endlessly stands in comparison to an other. Instead of being autonomous we are all incorporated in a fabric of complex and mobile relations. Our identity is to be found, as it were, on a inspissation of communication circuits. The postmodern subject is thus characterised by a alive(p) and a diversity that were alien to the traditional individual. This change in the incline of the human being has had the same effect as the end of the Grand Narratives many more people can now make a claim to subjectivity who were previously excluded, such as sears, women and homosexuals. This can also be witnessed by the recognition of art and culture produced by women, people of colour, and artificers from the so called Third World. This development has resulted in a overmuch greater freedom in the formation of human identity. Just look at pop culture, where someone like Madonna assumes a different image with the regularity of a clock. Today you can play with your identity by gender bending, for simulation. Or by crossings with other ethnic cultures, such as Surinamese or Dutch Muslims who borrow elements from the American black strike subculture. Fashion is an important component of the play with identity. In in front days it was your gender and your class that set what you had to wear, and there were strict rules that were not so easy to transgress. These rules now only bear to the Queen. Everyone else stands infront of the water closet each morning to determine which clothes match his or her liking baroque, gothic, sexy, or maybe businesslike today after all? PostmodernismThirdly, the term postmodernism as applied to art and culture. A crucial characteristic of postmodernism is the fade distinction between juicy and low culture. Over the course of the twentieth century the traditional notion of culture has been freed from its connection with elitist art. Scholars nowadays take a broad notion of culture, base on Raymond Williamss far-famed expression culture as a whole way of feel (1958). Here it concerns a view of culture as a trust within a social and historical context. The rigid distinction between high and lowculture is no longer tenable. In any case, it was endlessly largely base on the controversy between word and image in Western culture, where the word is seen as the expression of the transcendency of the mind and the image as expressing emotion and the baser desires of the corpse. The shift from a textual to a visual culture means the image is no longer viewed in purely negative terms but is valued for all its positive exponents and the experiences it evokes. Moreover, high culture and low culture cannot be unequivocally linked to particular trains (read literature versus television). Every art form has its low ethnic expression. Just think of the portraits of the gypsy boy with a pluck running down his face or pulp romantic novels. juicy is stepping off its pedestal haute couture is influenced by street culture. Low is upgraded and receives attention in newspaper art supplements or is exhibited in the museum. Advertising photos from Benetton, electronic computer art by Micha Klein and fashion photos by Inez cutting edge Lamsweerde have all been shown in Dutch museums.Dmocratisation and commercialisation are also crucial to the news of high and low. Increased prosperity and dissemination via the media have brought art and fashion to within almost everyones reach. The enormous numbers of visitors to major exhibitions testify to this, as does the festivalisation of big cities. Culture is in and is eagerly consumed in large quantities. Moreover, commerci ality is no longer associated exclusively with low culture it has penetrated high culture, as can be deduced from the weeklytop ten lists for literature, the heap of CDs of music by Bach and Mozart in the local supermarket, Audis sponsoring of the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam, or Karl Lagerfelds designs at H&M. Another postmodern suffer is inter- textuality, which amounts to the idea that a text always refers to other texts. Every text is a web of quotations, borrowed words and references. This term does not, of course, simply represent a narrow view of text images likewise ceaselessly refer to each other. Advertising spots refer to video powder stores, which borrow from television series, which in their turn quote films, which are themselves based on a novel. And that novel refers again to a play by Shakespeare, and so on and so on. Its an endless game. Madonnas video clip Material missy refers for example to Marilyn Monroes song Diamonds are a Girls Best Friend in the film Ge ntlemen Prefer Blondes. In an ad forEstee Lauder perfume, the model walks through a digital area of flowers that is equal to the one Madonna walks through in hervideoclip Love Profusion. Nicole Kidman, in the commercial for Chanel No. 5, does a perfect repeat of her component in Moulin Rouge. Some directors, such as Baz Luhr- man or Quentin Tarantino, have made inter- textuality their trademark. A large part of the visual pleasure in contemporary culture is based on recognition the more references you can place, the more clever you feel as smasher. Some theorists, such as Frederic Jameson, call the postmodern form of intertextuality a mixed bag. A pastiche is a textual or visual quotation which merely repeats untarnished quoting is the name of the game.The reference has no deeper content because all historical connections are abandoned. This can also be found in fashion. If you look at a John Galliano creation you can recognise myriad quotations from other cultures (ethnic p rints), from other multiplication (nineteenth century silhouette), from street culture (bag dame with shopping cart and plastic bags) and even from the circus (clown-like make-up). Everything is thrown into a big pile while elements are wrenched from their historical time and geographical context. A term a lot used in this connection is bricolage, which literally means making do. Weve become a cut & paste culture, where everyone can tinker about and scramble together their clothes and even their identity. Postmodern culture is thus characterised by pastiche and bricolage. Its not always an easy matter to indicate the significance of this cultural phenomenon, but it doesmake fashion playful and flexible, without it being compelled into an overruling Grand Narrative. A nett characteristic of postmodernism that I would like to discuss is the transition from representation to simulation. We have already seen that postmodern pastiche quoting, borrowing and referring does not necess arily have any deeper meaning. This is because postmodern culture no longer represents, but simulates. This process is dependent upon the role of media technology. 1963 Amsterdam (NED)In 2003 the magazine American Photo put together a list of the 25 best photographers in the world. That list contained one Dutch name Inez cutting edge Lamsweerde. Both an artist and a fashion photographer, she has ignored the dividing line between art, fashion and commercial work from the very beginning. And successfully. Her work is shown in many glossies such as The Face, Vogue and Arena Homme Plus (editorials and advertising campaigns) as well as in international museums and galleries. Her signature is clearly recognisable in both areas. Inez new wave Lamsweerde once said in an interview that she was obsessed with looker. Its always people she photographs or recreates, to be precise. Her digitally altered creatures are alienating. Too smooth, too clone-like, too impersonal to be fully human. Sh e often bases her work on archetype effeminate images from the mass media and the body culture in connection with gene technology, surgery and bodybuilding, the manipulation of the body, identity and sex. In the series Final Fantasy (1993) terzetto-year-old girls posed coquettishly in satin underclothes but with the mouths of adult men superimposed on their faces.The cloyingly new eroticised tot turns out to be a tike demon. The series The woods V995) shows mWd-manneted passwe men vjWV womens hands, and the women in Thank You Thighmaster (1993) are really mutants who correspond mannequins, without body hair and with a neutral skin surface where nipples and fork are supposed to be. The photographic tv camera doesnt lie? You certainly look forward to it does. galore(postnominal) models in Van Lamsweerdes fashion photos are hyperstylised, magnified stereotypes, perfectly beautiful, without irregularities and without individual features. They move in a hyperrealistic settin g in which the whole effect sometimes suggests the work of Guy Bourdin (for example, see the series Invisible Words in Blvd 2,1994). But her oeuvre is more respective(a) than that of the old master, so it is also less likely to be tie in to a certain time period. Inez van Lamsweerde graduated from Amsterdams Rietveld Academy in 1990.That same year she got her first picture taking assignment, the results of which attended in Modus. In 1992 she received the Dutch Photography Prize as well as the European Kodak Prize (gold in the categories Fashion and hoi polloi/Portraits). Since the early nineties she has been working almost entirely with her husband, Vinoodh Matadin. Today Van Lamsweerde and Matadin live and work chiefly in current York. The most recent developments in their work suggest a preference for less reconstructed photographs. In 2002 they took nine black-and-white photos of the members of the theatre group Mug met de Gouden Tand (Mosquito with the Gold Tooth). In 2003 they produced a nude calendar for Vogue. All without digital effects. LiteratureHainley. Bruce. Inez van Lamsweerde, Art- Forum, October 2004. Inez van Lamsweerde Photographs.Deichtor- hallen Hamburg Schirmer/Mosel. 1999. Jonkers. Gert. Inez en Vinoodh, Volkskrant Magazine, 22 February 2003. Kauw op het lijf. Rotterdam Nederlands Foto Instituut. 1998. Schutte, Xandra. Perverse onschuld, De Groene Amsterdamer, 10 family line 1997. Terreehorst. Pauline. Modus Over mensen mode en het leven. Amsterdam De Balie. 1990. IllustrationInez van Lamsweerde. Devorah and Mienke. 1993In the old conception of art, with Plato or Kant for example, a work of art refers to something deeper or higher beyond veracity. Every work of art is queer and hence irreplaceable. As early as the 1930s Walter Benjamin argued that the role of the work of art was ever-changing because of reproductive technologies. With the invention of photography and film (and later television and the Internet), any image can be reproduced infinitely. A facsimile of Rembrandts The Night- watch always remains a replicate of a famous, original painting, whereas a copy of Man Rays photograph of Kiki as a violin has no original. In the age of automatonlike reproduction the distinction between original and copy and then disappears, and with it what Benjamin calls arts aura, namely that which makes a work of art unique and original.For fashion, reproductive technology initially meant anenormous stimulus, since images of designs could be disseminated via the mediums of magazines and television. But in fashion, too, the copy has now overtaken the original design. A day after the fashion shows in Paris or Milan, the photos are already on the Internet and six weeks later H&M can sell replicas in their shops. In Pop Art, Andy Warhol played with the idea of the copy by producing silk-screened images of cans of Campbell soup or icons like Marilyn Monroe. Another example of the loss of aura is the disappointment all of us may feel when see Da Vincis Mona Lisa or Vermeers Girl with the Pearl Earring in the museum. Weve already seen so many reproductions in books, films, on mugs, towels, with moustache and beard, or as a doll, that the original is hardly a match for these. that if you truly succeed in experiencing the painting in the silence of the museum (but can you ever with all those tourists around you?), you may still find the original aura. In the seventies, Jean Baudrillard went a step further than Benjamin by claiming that not only art but also truth is changing under the onslaught of the media. He argues that the ubiquity of the media turns reality into a simulacrum, a copy of a copy. The simulacrum abolishes the departure between being and look.Think of someone pretending to be sick this person actually starts to demonstrate signs of sickness, so that it is no longer clear what is real and what is fake. Its the same with postmodernism our culture is so thoroughly medialised th at our experience is determined by the media. Media do not reflect reality, but construct it. Or to put it differently media do not represent reality, but simulate it. We all know this phenomenon from our own experience. When were on holiday in Greece, for example, we shout out that the sea is as blue as on the postcard. Our experience is determined by an image, in this case the postcard. If were on safari in Kenya, it seems as though weve landed in a National geographic TV programme. And when we say to our beloved I love you we cant help feeling were acting in a soap. Umberto Eco thus says that we are assuming a permanent ironic attitude in postmodern times. We can no longer innocently say I love you, because weve already seen and heard it a hundred thousand times on TV.The words have lost their meaning as well as their authenticity. But what we can do, according to Eco, is say it with irony As Ridge in The Bold and the Beautiful would say, I love you. epoch reality shows on tel evision try to simulate life as much aspossible, life itself has become one big reality show, in which being and appearance can no longer be separated. In art and in fashion we can see a longing for authenticity, as a nostalgic reaction to the culture of simulacra. People want something real again in a postmodern culture in which the dividing line between real and unreal has become wafer-thin. The question, however, is whether such authenticity is still possible. Such is the power of the simulacrum that the media have created. Now that I have given an outline of postmodernism as a frame within which fashion functions, it is time to look more closely at instruments that can be used to analyse images. These analytical methods all come from poststructuralism, the conjecture underlying postmodernism. IIAnalysisThe semiotic signPoststructuralism was informed in the sixties by semiotics, psychoanalysis and Marxism. Poststructuralism is also referred to as the lingual turn, since phras eology formed the model for the development of these theories. De Saussures writings on semiotics helped to develop a structuralist analysis of the grammar of any agreement, whether a apologue, advertisement, film, fashion or novel, as in the work of the anthropologist Lvi-Strauss, the early Barthes or the film semiotician Metz (Sim 1998). The central idea that language is paradigmatic for meaning is followed by virtually all postmodern philosophers. According to the psychoanalytical theories of Lacan, even the unconscious is structured like a language. Although some philosophers pointed out that language and signification are fundamentally unstable, as in the deconstructionism of Derrida, or in Lyotards postmodern loss of Grand Narratives, text remains the central focus in poststructuralism. Everything in fact is interpreted as text, including image, music or fashion. While semiotics initially concentrated on literature, scholars soon started focussing on the field of popular cul ture, such as architecture, fashion, music, sport, womens magazines or the video clip to mention a few examples at random. Semiotics is the theory of signs (from the Grecian semeion, meaning sign). A sign is the smallest element that carries a meaning. Language is the system of signs that we are most familiar with, but traffic signs or, as Barthes has shown, fashion are also sign systems.Asign consists of a bod (in French, signifiant), the material carrier of meaning, and the signified (in French, signifi), the content to which reference is made. The letters and toilsome of the word dress form the material bodys, which refer to the content of a concrete dress. Signifier and signified, form and content, together create meaning. The relationship between phase and signified is almost always haughty there is, after all, no reason why something is called a dress in face, a jurk in Dutch, and a japon in French. A sign always refers to something in reality. The first meaning of a s ign is referential it is the meaningyou can look up in the dictionary. But things seldom have just one meaning most signs have many secondary meanings. These are called connotations. In that case, the denotative sign, the signifier and the signified form a new entity, a new signifier for a new connotative sign, as in the interest diagram form SIGNIFIED CONNOTATION soma course filename extensionA known example is the red flush. At the denotative take aim it is simply a flower with leaves and thorns. In order to become a sign of love, the denotative meaning of the flower must become in its turn a signifier. The sign then forms the basis for a connotative, second meaning love. Why? Because it is agreed upon in our culture that the rose, especially the red rose, symbolismises love. An Amnesty International poster adds a third meaning to this well-known symbol by surrounding the thorns with barbed conducting wire and placing the words fierceness ceases where love begins halfwa y up the stem. The flower thus becomes a symbol of love and non-violence, while the thorns stand for violence. (Please read the table from the bottom up). SIGNIFIER red rose as love SIGNIFIED thorns with barbed wire love SECOND CONNOTATION love is the reverse of violence SIGNIFIER red rose SIGNIFIER red rose FIRSTCONNOTATION My love for you SIGNIFIERrose SIGNIFIER Flower with thorns and leaves DENOTATION Flower of the species Rosa The multimedia image is an extremely complicated sign and can convey meaning in many ways. A still image, such as a fashion or advertising photograph, has the following signifiers * perspective (camera position angle, distance)* shut in* photographic aspects such as exposure, rough grain, colour or black and white * composition or mise-en-scene of what is render setting, costume, make-up, attitude and actions of the model, etc. * text caption or legendA moving image, such as film, television commercials, video clip or fashion show, has, all of the in a higher place aspects, plus even more signifiers * movement of the models or actors choreography* camera movement (pan, tilt, dolly, tracking)* editing* sound (dialogue, added sounds like creaking door)* music either analysis requires us to briefly go over all these elements, since they influence the meaning. lonesome(prenominal) then can you determine the denotation and the connotations. A close- up has a different effect than a long shot. Camera movements direct the viewers gaze. Quick editing evokes tension. Music creates atmosphere, as does lighting. This type of dinner gown analysis soon reveals that the image is neer simply a copy or a reflection of reality, even though what the camera records is real. heretofore so many technological and aesthetic choices enter into the registration that reality is always moulded and constructed. The aim of analysis is to make this construction transparent. Digital imagesA formal analysis can be deepened even further by using the semiotic s of C.S. Peirce, an American who developed his theories at the same time in the early twentieth century as De Saussure in Switzerland, without their being aware of each other. Peirces semiotics is used more often for analysing images because he focuses less on text than De Saussure does. Peirce argues that there are three sorts of relationships between the signifier and the signified iconic, indexical and symbolic. An iconic relationship means that there is a similarity or relation between the signifier and the signified. An example of an iconic relationship is the portrait the image (the signifier) resembles that which is portrayed (the signified). An indexical relationship presumes an actual connection between signifier andsignified. A classic example is smoke as the signifier of fire, or the footprint in the sand as the signifier of the presence of a man on an uninhabited island.The symbolic relationship corresponds to what De Saussure calls the arbitrary relation between signi fier and signified the red rose is a convention, based on an agreement. Yet this remains a moot point, because the rose has an iconic relation to the fe phallic sex organ. It is this resemblance that has probably led to the rose sightly a symbol for love. All three relationships apply to the mechanically reproducible image, like the photograph or film. An image is always iconic since that which is depicted shows a resemblance to the signifiers every photograph is a portrait of a person or an object. Something that is photographed or filmed is also always indexical there is a facturelationship, since the camera records reality-with the camera you sanction that youve been somewhere (I was here the visual proof that tourists bring base as their trophy). Finally, the image, like language, has symbolic meanings, which are created through an interplay of the many audiovisual aid signifiers mentioned above. Digital technology has put the indexi- cal relation under strain, because we can no longer know with certainty whether an image is analogue, and thus standing in a factual relation to reality, or digital, made in the computer without an existential relation to reality.Digital images thus create confusion. In semiotic terms they maintain the iconic relation, for they look just like photographs and display a similarity between signifier and signified. But digital images are no longer indexical. This is what happens in Diesels Save Yourself photo series. We see tiny models who look like people (iconic relation), but all the same seem unreal. Their skin is too smooth, the postures too rigid, the look too glassy. We suspect soon enough that the image has been digitally manipulated, which disturbs the indexical relation these are not actual shots of real people. The tension between the iconic and the indexical relationship draws attention to the tension between real and unreal. And this creates a symbolic meaning. Together with the text, the photographs comment iro nically on our cultures obsession with remaining foreveryoung. Sometimes the digital manipulation is immediately clear, as in this picture of Kate Moss as a cyborg a cybernetic organism. Because this is clearly an impossible image of a half human / half machine figure, we dont get confused about the indexical status of the photograph.Itssymbolic meaning is immediately apparent, which here too represents a comment on the artificial ideal of beauty. It is typical of digital photography to create images of people that are like cyborgs, since many art and fashion photographs in todays visual culture explore the peregrine borders between man, machine and mannequin. Looking and being looked at I the voyeuristical gazeFashion is deeply aimd with eroticism and sexuality. To analyse this we can turn to psychoanalysis, which determines how we shape our desires. The most classic model for desire is the Oedipus complex, which regulates how the child focuses its love of the parent onto the oth er sex and projects feelings of rivalry onto the parent of the same sex. This is more complicated for girls because they at first experience love for the buzz off and later have to convert this into love for the father, while the boy can continue his love for the mother without interruption.The Oedipus complex is particularly applicable in stories, in both literature and film, but in the fashion world it actually plays no crucial role, and so I wont be going into it any further here. More relevant to fashion is the eroticism of flavour. According to Freud, any desire or sexuality begins with looking, or what he calls scopophilia (literally the love of looking). The desiring gaze often leads to touch and ultimately to sexual activities. Although it has a rather dirty sound to it, scopophilia is a quite familiar part of the sexual drive. Film theorists were quick to claim that the medium of movie theatre is in fact based on scopophilia in the darkness of the movie theatre we are voyeurs permitted to look at the screen for as long as we like. There is always something erotic in watching films, in contrast to television which does not offer the same voyeuristic conditions since the light is on in the living room, the screen is much smaller and there are all sorts of distractions.Laura Mulvey (1975) was the first theorist to draw attention to the vital role of gender in visual pleasure. The active and passive side of scopophilia (voyeurism and exhibitionism respectively) are relegated to strict roles of men and women. As John Berger, in his famous book Ways of Seeing, had already argued, men act and women appear, or rather, men look and women are looked at. According to Mulvey, this works as follows in classical cinema. The male character is watching a fair sex, with the camerafilming what the man sees (a so- called point of view shot). The attestor in the movie theatre thus looks at the woman through the plazas of the male character. The female body is mor eover cut up into fragments by framing and editing a piece of leg, a breast, the buttocks or the face. The female body is thus depicted in a fragmented way. We can therefore say that theres a doubled gaze that collapses into each other the male character, the camera and the spectator. Mulvey argues that the film spectator always adopts a structurally male position. It is important to realise that the filmic means, such as camera operation, framing, editing and often music as well, exteriorise the womans body into a spectacle. In Mulveys words, the woman is signified as to-be-looked-at-ness. At the same time the filmic means prefer the male character so that he can actively look, plow and act. Mulvey takes her analysis even furtherwith the help of psychoanalysis. The voyeuristic gaze upon the female body arouses desire and therefore creates tension for both the male character and the spectator. Moreover, the womans body is disturbing because of its intrinsic difference from the m ale body. Freud would say the female body is castrated, but we can put it somewhat more neutrally the female body is different. In a society dominated by men, women are the sign of sexual difference. In most cultures, it is (still?) the case that the woman-as-other, namely as other than man, endows sexual difference with meaning. Otherness, strangeness, difference always instils fear. The otherness of women incites fear in men at an unconscious level and this fear needs to be exorcised through culture, in film or art.According to Mulvey, this happens in cinematic stories in two ways. Firstly, through sadism where the female body is controlled and inserted into the social order. Sadism mainly accompanies a tosh and acquires form in the narrative structure. The erotic gaze frequently results in violence or rape. Nor is it accidental that in the classic Hollywood film the femme fatale is killed off at the end of the movie. No happy end for any woman who is sexually active. Only in the nineties is she allowed to live on at the end, like Catherine Trammell in Basic Instinct, or in television series like Sex and the City. The second way of exorcising the fear evoked by the female body is through fetishism. In that case the female star is off-key into an image of perfectbeauty that diverts attention from her difference, her otherness. The camera fetishises the womans body by dilatory endlessly on the spectacle of female beauty. At such heartbeats the film narrative comes momentarily to a hold. Although Mulveys analysis dates from the seventies, her insights are still of extensive relevance for fashion today. The spectacle of fashion shows is almost totally constructed around looking at fetishised female bodies. Models have taken the place of film stars as the fetishised image of perfected femininity.Many fashion reportages make use in one way or another of the sexu- alised play of looking and being looked at. However, some things have changed since the time of M ulveys analysis. Feminist criticism has indeed counteracted womens passivity in recent decades, and now we often see a more active and playful role for the female model. not only is the woman less passive, but both fashion and other popular visual genres such as video clips have turned the male body into the object of the voyeuristic gaze. Now the male body too is being fragmented, objectified and eroticised. This is happening not only in fashion reportages but also on the catwalk. It may be interesting for students of fashion to take a closer look at how the male body is visualised, how passive or active the male model is, and how the gaze is support by filmic or other means. Ethnicity also plays a role in the game of looking and being looked at. Stuart Hall (1997) and Jan Nederveen Pieterse (1992) have produced an extensive historical analysis of the way that coloured and black people are depicted in Western culture.Stereotypes are abundant, as in the image of the alien black wo man as Venus or the black man as sexually threatening. There are still very few black models in the fashion world. Again, it may be useful for students of fashion to analyse how ethnicity is visualised because of this long history of stereotyping. Does exoticising the model, for example, emphasise ethnicity? Or does it involve an actual denial of ethnic difference? This happens for example in fashion photos of Naomi Campbell with straight golden hair, or wearing blue contact lenses. Here, the black model has to conform to the white norm of ideal beauty. Looking and being looked at II the egotistical gaze So far I have been talking about looking at the other, but psychoanalysis also has something to say about looking at yourself. As a baby you are hardly conscious of yourself, because that self, or in psychoanalytical terminology the ego, still has to be constructed.A primarymoment in ego formation is what Jacques Lacan has called the reverberate phase. A second important moment is the aforementioned Oedipus complex in which language plays a major role. The reverberate phase, however, precedes language and takes place in the Imaginary, the realm of images. When youre between six and eighteen months, and so still a baby, youre usually held in your mothers arms in front of the reflect. In identifying with its mirror image, the child learns to recognise itself in the mirror and to distinguish itself from the mother. This identification is important for the construction of the childs own identity. For Lacan, it is crucial that this identification is based on the mirror image. He argues that the mirror image is always an idealisation, because the child projects an ideal image of itself. In the mirror the child sees itself as a unity, while it still experiences its own body as a unformed mass with no control over its limbs. The recognition of the self in the mirror image is in fact a misrecognition. The child is actually identifying with the image of itself as o ther, namely as a more ideal self that he or she hopes to become in the future. Just check how you look at yourself in the mirror at home in fact you always look at yourself through the eyes of the other.According to Lacan, this is in a certain sense mans tragedy we build our identity on an ideal image that we can never live up to. In his eyes, then, we are always doomed to sorrow at an existential level. We can take the mirror very literally (it is striking how often mirrors feature in films, videoclips, advertisements and fashion photos), but we can also interpret the process more metaphorically. For instance, the child sees an ideal image of itself reflected in the eyes of its adoring parents who put him or her on a pedestal for your parents youre always the most beautiful child in the world. And rightly so. When were older we see that ideal image reflected in the eyes of our beloved. We need that ideal image in order to be able to form and sustain our ego. Its a healthy narcis sistic gaze that is necessary for our identity. That ego is never finished, however it has to be nurtured and shaped time and time again. And this is helped by internalising ideal images. The analysis of the mirror phase has been applied to many phenomena within visual culture.The film hacek or heroine functions as the ideal image with which we identify ourselves. In the fashion world its the models. In fact you could designate visual culture as a whole in this way pop stars, models and actors alloffer us opportunities for identifying with ideal images. Fan culture is largely based on this narcissistic identification. Theres another side to it, of course. In a culture in which youth, fitness and beauty are becoming more and more important, the ideal image becomes ever more unattainable. Many people are no longer able to recognise themselves in that prescribed ideal image and are extremely dissatisfied with their appearance. That then leads to frustration and drastic measures like p lastic surgery, or to ailments like anorexia and bulimia. In that case the narcissistic gaze in the mirror falls diddle of expectations. Looking and being looked at III the wide gazeSo far we have mainly been concerned with analysing the desiring gaze the voyeuristic look at the other (the desire to possess the other) and the narcissistic look at oneself (the desire to be the other). It is also possible to make a more sociological analysis of the play of looks in society. This brings us to the historian Michel Foucault, who has made a thorough analysis of how power works. Instead of seeing power as something that the one has and the other lacks, he argues that in modern culture power circulates in a continual play of negotiation, conflict and confrontation, opposite and contradictions.Changes regarding power are reflected in language. Whereas you were a victim in earlier days, now youre an expert of experience. In this way you give yourself a certain power, namely the power of ex perience, even if that experience is unpleasant. One way of shaping power in our modern culture is by means of surveillance, or what Foucault calls the panoptical gaze. He derived this from the architecture of eighteenth-century prisons which had a central prevail in a circular building with cells. A central authority, out of sight within the tower, could observe every prisoner in every cell. The prisoners were also unable to see each other.The panoptical gaze means that a large group of people can be put under constant guard and scrutiny, while they cannot look back. In this way, says Foucault, they are disciplined to behave properly. Today the role of surveillance and monitoring has been taken over by cameras. Everyone knows there are tribute cameras guarding our and your property in the street, in stations and supermarkets, in buses and trams and in museums. The knowledge that we are ceaselessly and everywhere being watched by ananonymous technology perhaps gives us a feeling of security (or the illusion of security). What is more important is that the panoptical gaze disciplines us to be orderly citizens. A large horizontal surface of discipline flows from constant observation. Just as with Lacans mirror phase, we can interpret the panoptical gaze more metaphorically. It is not only security cameras that are creating a panopticum, but also the ubiquitousness of media such as television and the Internet. Crime watch programmes show us images from surveillance videos in order to catch villains, while reality programmes reveal how our fellow citizens overstretch traffic offences.Satellites orbiting in space persist a permanent eye on us. Mobile telephones are normally equipped with GPS (Global Positioning System) and always know where we are to be found. When I was on holiday in Italy, my mobile phone sent me messages like you are now in Pisa, where you can visit the Leaning Tower or you are now in Piazza Signoria in Florence did you know that Michelan gelos David and so on. For a moment I was that little girl again who knows that God is always watching over her. But divine omnipresence has now been replaced by an anonymous, panoptical gaze. Our surfing deportment on the Internet and our purchasing behaviour in the supermarket are registered in the same way. We can bring these three ways of seeing together. With the voyeuristic gaze we discipline the other we all know that secret look which we use to approve or winnow out of someone at a glance. With the narcissistic gaze we discipline ourselves, through the wish to fulfil an ideal image. By internalising the panoptical gaze we discipline our social behaviour, as well as our bodies.Fashion plays an important role in this complicated play of gazes. You only have to wander around any school playground or look around you in the street to realise how fashion determines whether someone belongs or not, what the ideal images are, and how groups keep an eye on each other, disciplining e ach other as to wane clothing. Through clothing I can make myself sexually hypnotic for the voyeuristic gaze of the other. Or I can subject the other to my voyeuristic gaze if I find their body and clothes attractive. I can use clothing to construct my own identity and emanate a particular ideal image. But fashion is more than just clothing. Fashion also dictates a specific ideal of beauty. That beauty myth determines how we discipline our bodies, for example by subjecting them to diets, fitness, beauty treatments such as waxing, depilation, bleaching andeven to plastic surgery. In short, fashion ultimately affects the body too. We see an example of that in the digital photo series Electrum corpus by Christophe Luxerau, which shows us how fashion is literally engraved on the skin the logo has become our skin. BibliographyOn postmodernismBaudrillard,Jean.5/w/ai/ow5. New York Semiotext(e), 1983. Braembussche, A.A. van den. Denken over kunstEen inleiding in dekunstfilosofie. 3rd, rev ised ed. Bussum Coutinho, 2000. Docherty, Thomas, ed .Postmodernism A reader. New York Columbia University Press, 1993. Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. capital of the United Kingdom Verso, 1991 Lyotard, Jacques. The postmodern condition. Manchester Manchester University Press, 1984. Sim, Stuart, ed. The icon critical dictionary of postmodern thought. Cambridge Icon Books, 1998. Smelik, Anneke. Carrousel der seksen gender benders in videoclips, in Een beeid van een vrouw. De visualisering van het vrouwelijke in een postmoderne cultuur, redact by R. Braidotti, 19-49. Kmpen Kok Agora, 1993. English version can be downloaded fromwww.annekesmelik.nl (publications articles). Woods, Tim. Beginning postmodernism. Manchester Manchester University Press, 1999. On culture and cultural studiesBaetens, Jan and Ginette Verstraete, eds. heathenish studiesEen inleiding. Nijmegen Vantilt, 2002. Cavallaro, Dani. Critical & cultural theory. capital of the United Kingdom Athlone Press, 2001. During, Simon, ed. The cultural studies reader. London Routledge, 1993. Grossberg, Lawrence, Cary Nelson, Paula Treichler, eds.Cultural studies. Routledge New York, 1992.Smelik, Anneke. Met de ogen wijd dicht. De visuele wending in de cultuurwetenschap, in Cultuurwetenschappen in Nederland en Belgie. Een staalkaart voor de toekomst, edited by Sophie Levie and Edwin van Meerkerk. Nijmegen Vantilt, 2005. Storey, John, ed. What is cultural studies? A reader. London Arnold, 1996. Williams, Raymond. Culture and society 1780-1950. Harmondsworth Penguin, 1958. On visual cultureBenjamin, Walter. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, reprinted in Illuminations, 217-251. New York Schocken Books, 1968 (1935).Berger, John. Ways of seeing. Harmondsworth Penguin, 1972. Foucault, Michel. Panopticism, in Discipline & vindicate The birth of the prison. New York Vintage Books, 1979 (1975). Hall, Stuart. Representation. London, Sage, 1997. Mirzoeff , Nicholas. The visual culture reader. London Routledge, 1999. Mitchell, William. check theory Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1994. Mitchell, William. The reconfigured eye Visual truth in the post photographic era. Cambridge MIT Press, 2001 (1992). Peters, Jan Marie. Het beeid Bouwstenen voor een algemene iconologie. Antwerpen Hadewijch, 1996. Smelik, Anneke, with R. Buikema and M. Meijer.Effectief beeldvormen Theorie, praktijk en analyse van beeldvormingsprocessen. Assen van Gorcum, 1999. (out of print the book can be downloaded from www.annekesmelik.nl ( publications books) Smelik, Anneke. Zwemmen in het asfalt. Het behagen in de visuele cultuur, Tijdschrift voor communicatiewetenschap 32, no. 3 (2004) 292-304. The adjudicate can be downloaded from www.annekesmelik.nl ( publications books oratie) Sturken, Marita and Lisa Cartwright. Practices of looking An introduction to visual culture. Oxford Oxford University Press, 2001. O n visual culture and genderCarson, Diane, Linda Dittmar, and Janice R. Welsch,eds. Multiple voices in womens liberationistfilm criticism. London and Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press, 1994- Carson, Fiona and Claire Pajaczkowska.Fem/msi visual culture. London Routledge, 2001.Easthope, Anthony. What a mans gotta do The masculine myth in popular culture. London Paladin, 1986. Mulvey, Laura. Visual pleasure and narrative cinema, in Visual and other pleasures, 14-26. London Macmillan, 1989(1975). Neale, Steve. maleness as spectacle, Screen 24, no. 6 (1983) 2-16. Simpson, Mark. Male impersonators Men execute masculinity. London Cassell, 1993. Smelik, Anneke. And the mirror crackedFeminist cinema and film theory. London Palgrave 1998 Smelik, Anneke. Feministfilm theory, in The cinema book, 2nd ed., edited by Pam Cook and Mieke Bernink, 353-365. London British Film Institute Publishing, 1999. The shew can be downloaded from www.annekesmelik.nl ( publications articles) On visual c ulture and ethnicityDyer, Richard. etiolate. London Routledge, 1997.Gaines, Jane. White privilege and looking relations race and gender in feminist film theory, Screen 29, no. 4 (1988) 12-27 hooks, bell. blackamoor looks take to the woods and representation. Boston South End Press, 1992.Nederveen Pieterse,Jan. White on black Images of blacks and Africa in Western popular culture. New Haven Yale University Press, 1992. Ross, Karen. Black and white media Black images in popular film and television. Cambridge Polity Press, 1996. Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam. UnthinkingEurocentrismMulticulturalism and the media. London Routledge, 1994. Williams, P. and L. Chrisman, eds. Colonial address and post colonial theory. New York Columbia University Press, 1994. Young, Lola. Fear of the dark. Race, gender and sexuality in the cinema. London Routledge, 1996. On new mediaBolter, Jay and Robert Grusin. Remediation rationality new media. Cambridge MIT Press, 1999. Castells, Manuel. The rise of the network society. Oxford Blackwell, 1996. Cartwright, Lisa. Film and the digital in visual studies. Film studies in the era of convergence, Journal of visual culture 1, no. 1 (2002) 7-23. Manovich, Lev. The language of new media. Cambridge MIT Press, 2001. Mul, Jos de. Cyberspace odyssee. Kampen Klement, 2002. Rodowick, David. Reading the figurai, or, philosophy after the new media. Durham Duke University Press, 2001.Simons, Jan. Interface en cyberspace Inleiding in de nieuwe media. Amsterdam Amsterdam University Press, 2002. On identityFreud, Sigmund. Three essays on the theory of sexuality.New York Basic Books, 1962 (1905).Freud, Sigmund. Female sexuality, in Sexuality and the psychology of love.New York Macmillan, 1963 (1931). Lacan, Jacques. The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience, in crits. A selection, 1-7. New York Norton, 1977 (1949)- Barthes, Roland. Le systme de la mode. Paris Seuil, 1967 R. Barthes & M. Ward, The fashion system. Berkeley etc. (University of California Press) 1990 Bruzzi, Stella and Pamela Church Gibson. Fashion cultures Theories, explanations, and analysis. London Routledge, 2000. Klein, Naomi. No logo. London Flamingo, 2001.