Affirmative Action :: Quotas Race Minority Academics Essays

affirmatory Action In Texas, acceptance to public universities for high school students is right off based on academic achievement - if a student is at the top ten percent of his or her class, he or she volition be automatically accepted. This is a way to counter the unfairness of affirmative action causes because the admission has nonhing to do with race or sex. Arguably, this form _or_ remains of government is reasonable because students studying at the same high school imbibe equal opportunity to learn and educate themselves. This may seem fair, nevertheless the same problem still exists. If a student has to work underemployed just to make a living because his or her family is unable to stimulate financially, how is this student going to find term to study and be self-made in school, and therefore, be in the top ten percent?In recent supreme court ruling, the point arranging that were using in admitting law students at the University of Michigan was ruled unconstituti onal and therefore interpreted out. The university used a point system that quantified the qualification of the applicants status. If a students points overhaul a certain number, he or she is admitted to the school. The university gives an extra twenty points to the minorities in terms of enforcing affirmative action and helping the disadvantaged. The six of the judges look at that the defined number system is in many ways uniform as having a set quota in admitting minority students, which was banned in the case of University of California v. Bakke of 1978. The judges believe that having a rule in admitting students strictly by race is impersonal. In Bakkes case, the University defends itself for having such quota with the fact that admitting minority students into medical school can help improve social discrimination because the minority are less likely to have the education or the financial status to go to a medical school. As a result, being a doctor becomes majority profess ion. The judges at the time countered the universitys statements by stating that the school is being unfair to the non-minority applicants, who are not outright responsible of the social discrimination. The Supreme Court ruled the University of Michigans point system unconstitutional in the undergraduate level, but kept the same system for the Law school. They believe race should be taken into consideration, but should not quantify qualification. Although the judges opposing this ruling stated that A dogged numerical score for racial minority status has the virtue of honesty.