Studies of Bilateral Visual Fields on Word Recognition Essays -- Visio

Studies of symmetrical ocular Fields on Word RecognitionPrevious look into suggests a significant difference in intelligence activity recognition quantify between the remaining and right hand visual theaters, with word recognition and receipt time of the right visual sports stadium significantly faster than the left visual field. The current study investigated bilateral visual fields on word recognition time by means of an online computer political program consisting of 55 participants. It was hypothesized that men would respond faster than women, and the right visual field reaction times would be faster than the left. Results indicate that sex had no significant effect on reaction time. However, linguistic communication presented in the right visual field were responded to significantly faster than wrangle in the left. supporting previous findings of a right visual (left hemispheric) advantage. The Effect of Bilateral Visual Fields on Word Recognition When examining word recognition, there ar a variety of factors that come into play. These factors include the region each cerebral hemisphere plays in terms of language processing as well as the physiology of the brain. Further, when examining word recognition one must further understand the commixture of variables that come into play when dealing with word recognition. These include, but are non limited to the handedness of participants in word recognition studies, the type of words that are being studies (for example words of differing length, commonly used words versus less commonly used words), the manner by which participants are attending to the stimuli that are being presented, and the manner that words are presented. Understanding the role that each hemisphere of the brain plays in recognizing words, and the physiology of the brain is fundamental to the reasonableness of studies of word recognition. A primary tenet of neuropsychology is that the left hemisphere specializes in langu age, and language processing, tour the right hemisphere plays less of a role in the processing of language (Grimshaw, 1998, Nicholls & Wood, 1998). It should also be remark that stimuli presented to the right visual field has direct access to the left hemisphere, while information presented to the left visual field must first go to the right hemisphere, cross the corpus callosum, and then be interpreted in the left hemisphere (Grimshaw, 1998, Nicholls & Wood, 1998). Because each hemisphere of t... ...bral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 80, 45-62.Leventhal, G. (1988). Cerebral ascendency and attentional bias in word recognition. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 66, 791-800.Lindell, A. K., & Nicholls, M. E. (2003). attentional deployment in visual half-field tasks The effect of cue position on word naming latency. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 273-277.Nicholls, M. E. R., & Wood, A. G. (1998). The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition. Brain a nd Cognition, 38, 339-357.Ohnesorge, C., & Van Lancker, D. (2001). Cerebral laterality for famed proper nouns Visual recognition by normal subjects. Brain & Language, 77, 135-165.Proverbio, A. M., Zani, A., & Avella, C. (1997). Notes and intelligence Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a discriminating attention task. Brain and Cognition, 34, 311-320.Voyer, D. (2003). Word Frequency and laterality effects in lexical decision Right hemisphere mechanisms. Brain & Language, 87, 421-431.Weems, S., Reggia, J. (2004). Hemispheric metier and independence for word recognition A comparison of three computational models. Brain & Language, 89, 554-568.